Tech Today

When specifying high-density polyisocyanurate insulation, product differences warrant consideration

Polyisocyanurate insulation manufacturers' faced, high-density polyisocyanurate insulation cover board products have gained popularity and acceptance in the U.S. roofing industry. Differences among some high-density products mean some products are not necessarily interchangeable or, using common specification language, they are not "or equal."

Product standard

The U.S. product standard for faced rigid cellular polyisocyanurate is ASTM C1289, "Standard Specification for Faced Rigid Cellular Polyisocyanurate Thermal Insulation Board." ASTM C1289 describes 18 types of polyisocyanurate products, including polyisocyanurate insulation wall sheathing, roof insulation and composite boards. The products are differentiated with ASTM C1289 by type and, in some cases, also class and grade. For example, the proper ASTM International designation for fiberglass-reinforced, cellulose-faced polyisocyanurate thermal insulation with a minimum 20 pounds per square inch (psi) compressive strength is ASTM C1289, Type II, Class 1, Grade 2. In this designation, Class 1 specifically designates the facer sheets and Grade 2 designates the board has a minimum 20-psi compressive strength.

Faced, high-density polyisocyanurate insulation cover board is designated as ASTM C1289, Type II, Class 4 followed by Grade 1, 2 or 3. Grade 1 designates a minimum 80-psi compressive strength; Grade 2 a minimum 110-psi compressive strength; and Grade 3 a minimum 140-psi compressive strength.

Faced, high-density polyisocyanurate insulation cover board

Faced, high-density polyisocyanurate insulation cover boards use coated polymer-bonded fiberglass facers similar to those used on ASTM C1289, Type II, Class 2 conventional polyisocyanurate insulation products.

Comparing faced, high-density polyisocyanurate insulation cover board to conventional polyisocyanurate insulation using ASTM C1289's physical requirements reveals high-density products have significantly higher compressive and flexural strengths and an allowable water absorption value two times or more than conventional polyisocyanurate insulation. Allowable dimensional stability values for faced, high-density polyisocyanurate insulation cover board are about half the values for conventional polyisocyanurate insulation used in roof systems in the length and width dimensions.

Comparing products

Review of polyisocyanurate insulation manufacturers' product literature reveals five of the six U.S. manufacturers of polyisocyanurate insulation produce one or more faced, high-density polyisocyanurate insulation cover board products; Rmax, Dallas, does not manufacture a high-density product.

Comparing the manufacturers' products reveals differences primarily based on products' minimum compressive strengths. The figure shows a categorization of manufacturers' faced, high-density polyisocyanurate insulation cover boards based on ASTM C1289, Type II, Class 4. Grade 2 products also comply with ASTM C1289, Type II, Class 4, Grade 1, and Grade 3 products also comply with ASTM C1289, Type II, Class 4, Grades 1 and 2.

NRCA's recommendations

For membrane roof systems, NRCA recommends designers specify a suitable cover board over polyisocyanurate and polystyrene thermal insulation. NRCA considers faced, high-density polyisocyanurate cover board to be a suitable cover board option for mechanically attached and adhered single-ply membrane roof systems. It also may be suitable in cold-applied and built-up membrane roof systems and cold-applied self-adhering polymer-modified bitumen roof systems.

Designers should specify faced, high-density polyisocyanurate cover board to be compatible with the membrane system and specific project requirements. NRCA recommends designers use the complete ASTM C1289 designation (including type, class and grade) to clearly delineate the specific product intended.

Mark S. Graham is NRCA's vice president of technical services.

More From This Issue

  • Seal it with silicone

    Many building owners choose to restore an aging roof system rather than replace it. High-solids 100 percent silicone roof coatings are gaining popularity as an advantageous alternative to traditional water- and solvent-based roof coatings. Silicone roof coatings provide energy-efficient, low-maintenance, watertight performance while alleviating several drawbacks commonly associated with water- and solvent-based roof coatings.

  • Roofing is now in session

    Constructed in 1905, the limestone-clad Birch Bayh Federal Building and U.S. Courthouse in Indianapolis is an impressive structure that exemplifies Beaux Arts architecture. In 2012, Blackmore & Buckner Roofing, a Tecta America company, Indianapolis, was tasked with restoring five roof systems on the courthouse while preserving its unique historic features.

  • Committed to excellence

    Nearly 20 years after its inception in 1996, The Roofing Industry Alliance for Progress continues to unite roofing industry leaders to pursue initiatives that will positively impact the industry. The 145 Alliance members work together to fund research, advance education, honor industry workers and provide forward-thinking responses to major economic and technological issues.

;